Elon Musk against Twitter: a first legal face-to-face organized today

After filing lawsuits against the boss of Tesla and SpaceX to force him to honor his takeover commitments, Twitter representatives must face Elon Musk’s lawyers on Tuesday during a preliminary hearing. A meeting that suggests a legal battle valued at several tens of billions of euros.

A high-risk duel. Lawyers for Twitter and Elon Musk will face each other for the first time on Tuesday in a preliminary hearing in an unprecedented legal battle between the world’s richest man and the social network, determined to be bought out by his defender. The platform launched lawsuits a week ago against the boss of Tesla and SpaceX to force him to honor his commitment to acquire it for 44 billion dollars (about 43 billion euros at today’s rate).

And although she is going through an image crisis after months of attacks and denigration from her ex-suitor, she is the favorite. “Twitter’s stock has been in good shape” since the lawsuit was filed, noted analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. “It seems that many investors who read it concluded that this Game of Thrones showdown in the courts is going to end in a Twitter victory.”

By “victory”, the expert means a decision of the judge which would force Elon Musk to buy the Californian group at the price agreed at the end of April (54.20 dollars per share / 53 euros) or to pay substantial damages.

an accelerated procedure from September?

The hearing on Tuesday must address the question of the date of a possible trial. Twitter asked for an accelerated procedure, from September, so as not to prolong the period of uncertainty which partially paralyzes the company.

Elon Musk’s lawyers filed an appeal last Friday not to open hostilities until next year. They assure that the experts will have to analyze “mountains of data” to prove, as the multi-billionaire claims, that the platform is full of automated accounts and spam, well beyond the proportion of 5% officially indicated. . The judge should also take into account the deadlines of the financial package negotiated with banks and investors, so as not to compromise the possibility of a takeover.

The businessman and the board of directors can still choose to agree on a slightly lower price and thus avoid the lawsuit, “but it would be rational reasoning”, underlines Adam Badawi, in reference to the unpredictability of Elon Musk, who acts as a “free electron”.

Indeed, in another case, Musk “had shown his willingness to go all the way,” adds the professor. “And he won. I don’t think his instinct is necessarily to come to an arrangement.”

musk accused of ‘hypocrisy’ and ‘bad faith’

Litigation depends on the Delaware Court of Chancery, a court in this small state in the eastern United States, specializing in business law. Its president Kathaleen McCormick – the first woman in this position – has taken up the matter. “She is a very serious judge, who will not be intimidated by either party. (…). In the past, she has not been tender with those who show bad faith, ”remarks Adam Badawi, professor of law at the University of Berkeley.

In its complaint, Twitter accused Elon Musk of having shown “hypocrisy” and “bad faith”. Lawyers for the company believe he has changed his mind in the face of the recent drop in stock market valuations of technology companies. “After putting on quite a show to target Twitter, and after proposing and then signing a merger deal, Musk appears to believe he’s free – unlike any party bound by a contract under the law of the Delaware – to change your mind, defame the company, disrupt its business, destroy its stock value and wash your hands of it,” they said.

Kathaleen McCormick is best known for having forced Kohlberg, a company that had also tried to break off an engagement, to buy the company in question, DecoPac.

The fate of the bluebird, a social network used worldwide by politicians, celebrities, activists and influencers, seems to have little in common with that of less prominent organizations. But “it’s not different enough, I think, for Delaware to risk its reputation by deciding not to apply the terms of the agreement”, considers Adam Badawi.

Leave a Comment