Twitter filed his response to Elon Musk’s complaint in court on Thursday, August 5, giving a more precise idea of the arguments of the multi-billionaire who is seeking to get out of the social network’s takeover agreement and accuses him of having ” thrown dust in the eyes”. The claims of the boss of Tesla and SpaceX “are factually inaccurate, legally insufficient and commercially irrelevant. We can’t wait for the trial to take place,” Bret Taylor, chairman of the platform’s board of directors, tweeted Thursday.
In mid-July, Twitter sued Elon Musk in the Delaware Court of Chancery, a court specializing in business law, to force him to honor his acquisition commitment for $ 44 billion. The trial is due to start on October 17. On Friday, the richest man in the world counterattacked with a “confidential” complaint. “According to Musk – the billionaire who has founded several companies and is advised by bankers and Wall Street lawyers – Twitter threw smoke and mirrors at him to get him to sign the buyout deal,” the network said. social. “It is an attempt to escape a contract that Musk no longer finds attractive since the stock market has fallen,” assert his lawyers.
READ ALSOAurélie Jean – Twitter: the ineffective transparency desired by Elon Musk
The issue of fake accounts
Elon Musk approached Twitter in April, then signed a deal for $54.20 a share. He unilaterally ended it in early July, on the grounds that the San Francisco-based company allegedly lied about the proportion of automated and spam accounts on its platform. According to the document filed Thursday by Twitter, the boss of Tesla accuses the board of directors of having concealed the true proportion of inauthentic accounts, which would be, according to him, of the order of 10% of active users in the world. daily and exposed to advertising. Twitter estimates it to be less than 5%.
The official documents filed by the platform with the American stock market policeman “contain numerous material misrepresentations and omissions which distort the value of Twitter and led Elon Musk to agree to buy the company at an inflated price”, assure the lawyers of business man. Twitter’s strategy, they continue, has been to “play hide and seek” to keep the buyer from “discerning the truth” for as long as possible. Twitter responds that the businessman rushed the negotiations and that the deal never mentioned the fake accounts.
Between the general decline in the stock market in recent months, falling social media ad revenue (due to economic conditions) and public criticism from Elon Musk, Twitter’s stock had crashed to around $32 on July 11. . It was worth around $41 on Thursday.
READ ALSOSudden fall in tech: “We hadn’t seen this since 2000”